Something different, a post in three versions.
Cursive writing
Printing
Digital text
You’re going to see three versions of this post. Apologies in advance: some of you may to struggle to read all three versions, especially this first one, written in cursive. The second will be printed by hand. The third will be typed directly into the newsletter editor. The entire post will be like a 21st century Rosetta Stone.
My gut reaction to the seeming abandonment of cursive writing by public education is to feel both sad and angry. Yes, it’s extremely important to know how to type these days; I consider my high school typing class to be one of the most important classes of all. But I would argue that complete reliance on keyboards and digital output would make our society weaker. Both modes of writing are important. There is significant value in being able to recognize a symbol in multiple forms and cursive writing can help develop this skill. Many handwritten works remain untranslated. Not all of our collective history is good but let’s not discount cursive writing, one of the only keys to that knowledge.
What do you think? Should we throw our pens and pencils away? Should we bring back cursive writing? Or does it matter?
This was really interesting! Don't know if you listen to Craig's Wednesday Audio but he has a legit hard time reading my cursive, which I thought was crazy until I realized I read your cursive WAY slower than I read your printing. . . which me got me thinking, maybe reading cursive is as much a meditative exercise as a cognitive exercise.
Okay, Mark, this hit a nerve with me too.
So much so, I'll be responding in a post on my Substack and publishing by this coming weekend. I need a couple days to cull examples, images, and draft and rewrite.
Suffice to say, there are three states of being in cursive, hand-printed, and key-stroked words, as well as other forms of communication such a calligraphy and doodling. I hope to rope that all in the forthcoming post.
Cheers, Mike